Exposure Connectivity of the Cyst Properties and Bmi
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P worthy of of Wald figure to evaluate to have an overall impact away from categorical BI-RADS thickness. All of the mathematical screening had been two-sided.
In the event BI-RADS occurrence failed to tailor threat of breast cancer demise when you look at the link to other pathological issues, female that have BI-RADS step one occurrence had a tendency to feel the large chance, in every stratum
¶ AJCC stage is included just like the a categorical covariate within the models which have all of the degree combined, which have and you will as opposed to phase IV.
Emergency design results for the family ranging from mammographic thickness and chance from cancer of the breast dying, complete and by AJCC phase*
(more…)